This work contributes to the theory of judgement aggregation by discussing a number of significant non-classical logics. After adapting the standard framework of judgement aggregation to cope with non-classical logics, we discuss in particular results for the case of Intuitionistic Logic, the Lambek calculus, Linear Logic and Relevant Logics. The motivation for studying judgement aggregation in non-classical logics is that they offer a number of modelling choices to represent agents' reasoning in aggregation problems. By studying judgement aggregation in logics that are weaker than classical logic, we investigate whether some well-known impossibility results, that were tailored for classical logic, still apply to those weak systems.
Judgement aggregation in non-classical logics
Editions Hermès,, Paris , Francia
Journal of applied non-classical logics 27 (2017): 106–139. doi:10.1080/11663081.2017.1368846
info:cnr-pdr/source/autori:Porello D./titolo:Judgement aggregation in non-classical logics/doi:10.1080/11663081.2017.1368846/rivista:Journal of applied non-classical logics/anno:2017/pagina_da:106/pagina_a:139/intervallo_pagine:106–139/volume:27