Do altmetrics work for assessing research quality?

Alternative metrics (aka altmetrics) are gaining increasing interest in the scientometrics community as they can capture both the volume and quality of attention that a research work receives online. Nevertheless, there is limited knowledge about their effectiveness as a mean for measuring the impact of research if compared to traditional citation-based indicators. This work aims at rigorously investigating if any correlation exists among indicators, either traditional (i.e. citation count and h-index) or alternative (i.e. altmetrics) and which of them may be effective for evaluating scholars. The study is based on the analysis of real data coming from the National Scientific Qualification procedure held in Italy by committees of peers on behalf of the Italian Ministry of Education, Universities and Research.

Publication type: 
Articolo
Author or Creator: 
Nuzzolese, Andrea Giovanni
Ciancarini, Paolo
Gangemi, Aldo
Peroni, Silvio
Poggi, Francesco
Presutti, Valentina
Publisher: 
Springer, Budapest , Ungheria
Source: 
Scientometrics (Print) 118 (2019): 539–562. doi:10.1007/s11192-018-2988-z
info:cnr-pdr/source/autori:Nuzzolese, Andrea Giovanni; Ciancarini, Paolo; Gangemi, Aldo; Peroni, Silvio; Poggi, Francesco; Presutti, Valentina/titolo:Do altmetrics work for assessing research quality?/doi:10.1007/s11192-018-2988-z/rivista:Scientometrics (
Date: 
2019
Resource Identifier: 
http://www.cnr.it/prodotto/i/398740
https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11192-018-2988-z
info:doi:10.1007/s11192-018-2988-z
http://www.scopus.com/record/display.url?eid=2-s2.0-85059581022&origin=inward
Language: 
Eng
ISTC Author: 
Aldo Gangemi's picture
Real name: 
Valentina Presutti's picture
Real name: 
Andrea Nuzzolese's picture
Real name: