Stress Still Affects Articulatory Planning in Reading Aloud: A Reply to White and Besner (2016)

In their comment, White and Besner (2016) argued against our conclusion that stress assignment may affect polysyllable pseudoword reading and concluded that, currently, we do not know whether the effect of stress position is solid and reliable. White and Besner stated that because the experiments reported in Sulpizio, Spinelli, and Burani (2015) have methodological problems, our conclusion is grounded on weak evidence. In this reply, we present further analyses of our data that overcome the methodological weakness highlighted by White and Besner. The results of these new analyses consistently mirror those reported by Sulpizio and colleagues (2015) and speak in favor of the view that, in reading Italian pseudowords aloud, stress assignment affects articulatory planning of the stimulus.

Tipo Pubblicazione: 
Articolo
Author or Creator: 
Sulpizio, Simone
Spinelli, Giacomo
Burani, Cristina
Publisher: 
American Psychological Association., [Washington], Stati Uniti d'America
Source: 
Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance 42 (2016): 2129–2131. doi:10.1037/xhp0000320
info:cnr-pdr/source/autori:Sulpizio, Simone; Spinelli, Giacomo; Burani, Cristina/titolo:Stress Still Affects Articulatory Planning in Reading Aloud: A Reply to White and Besner (2016)/doi:10.1037/xhp0000320/rivista:Journal of experimental psychology. Huma
Date: 
2016
Resource Identifier: 
http://www.cnr.it/prodotto/i/366167
https://dx.doi.org/10.1037/xhp0000320
info:doi:10.1037/xhp0000320
Language: 
Eng